vloqsouls 2024-12-29 02:19 p.m.Your honour, my client lost not only physical possessions but was deprived of his constitutional rights. Prior to him being slaughtered like a farm animal by the defendant, he was carrying a R21M which according to the Plaintiff ran him around $10,000 based on black market estimates. The estimation of the rifle's cost is due to its uniqueness in having a scope which the base R21 rifle model does not possess and its limited distribution considering that is a military rifle. Nevertheless, whether or not my client bought the rifle is irrelevant as highlighted by the defendant, considering that the rifle lost was a thing of value and the value attached to it is substantial enough to be considered a legitimate loss of property.
Furthermore, my client took shots from the defendant which did not immediately result in his death, leading to unnecessary pain and suffering. As evidenced by Exhibit A, he attempted to avoid the line of fire from the defendant shooting at the car dealership window towards the register, however the defendant continued to fire directly at my client resulting in his unnecessary death. However, considering that this is after all a lego game and that people can respawn after death, we'd like to pursue no more than an additional $5,000 in compensatory damages.
Based on the aforementioned we believe that $15,000 in compensatory damages is appropriate due to the harm suffered and the substantial loss of property.
cc: @acerxtro